- Status of This Memo
-
This RFC is a slightly annotated list of the 100 RFCs from RFC 3400
through RFC 3499. This is a status report on these RFCs. This memo
provides information for the Internet community. It does not specify
an Internet standard of any kind. Distribution of this memo is
unlimited.
- Copyright Notice
-
Copyright © The Internet Society (2003). All Rights Reserved.
- Note
-
Many RFCs, but not all, are Proposed Standards, Draft Standards, or
Standards. Since the status of these RFCs may change during the
standards processing, we note here only that they are on the
standards track. Please see the latest edition of "Internet Official
Protocol Standards" for the current state and status of these RFCs.
In the following, RFCs on the standards track are marked [STANDARDS
TRACK].
- RFC Author Date Title
-
--- ------ ---- -----
- 3499 Ginoza Request for Comments Summary
-
- This memo.
-
Page 2
- 3498 Kuhfeld Mar 2003 Definitions of Managed Objects
-
for Synchronous Optical
Network (SONET) Linear
Automatic Protection Switching
(APS) Architectures
- This memo defines a portion of the Management Information Base (MIB) for
-
- use with network management protocols in TCP/IP based internets. In
-
- particular, it defines objects for managing networks using Synchronous
-
- Optical Network (SONET) linear Automatic Protection Switching (APS)
-
- architectures. [STANDARDS TRACK]
-
- 3497 Gharai Mar 2003 RTP Payload Format for
-
Society of Motion Picture and
Television Engineers (SMPTE)
292M Video
- This memo specifies an RTP payload format for encapsulating uncompressed
-
- High Definition Television (HDTV) as defined by the Society of Motion
-
- Picture and Television Engineers (SMPTE) standard, SMPTE 292M. SMPTE is
-
- the main standardizing body in the motion imaging industry and the SMPTE
-
- 292M standard defines a bit-serial digital interface for local area HDTV
-
- transport. [STANDARDS TRACK]
-
- 3496 Malis Mar 2003 Protocol Extension for Support
-
of Asynchronous Transfer Mode
(ATM) Service Class-aware
Multiprotocol Label Switching
(MPLS) Traffic Engineering
- This document specifies a Resource ReSerVation Protocol-Traffic
-
- Engineering (RSVP-TE) signaling extension for support of Asynchronous
-
- Transfer Mode (ATM) Service Class-aware Multiprotocol Label Switching
-
(MPLS) Traffic Engineering. This memo provides information for the
- Internet community.
-
Page 3
- 3495 Beser Mar 2003 Dynamic Host Configuration
-
Protocol (DHCP) Option
for CableLabs Client
Configuration
- This document defines a Dynamic Host Configuration Protocol (DHCP)
-
- option that will be used to configure various devices deployed within
-
- CableLabs architectures. Specifically, the document describes DHCP
-
- option content that will be used to configure one class of CableLabs
-
- client device: a PacketCable Media Terminal Adapter (MTA). The option
-
- content defined within this document will be extended as future
-
- CableLabs client devices are developed. [STANDARDS TRACK]
-
- 3494 Zeilenga Mar 2003 Lightweight Directory Access
-
Protocol version 2 (LDAPv2)
to Historic Status
- This document recommends the retirement of version 2 of the Lightweight
-
- Directory Access Protocol (LDAPv2) and other dependent specifications,
-
- and discusses the reasons for doing so. This document recommends RFC
-
- 1777, 1778, 1779, 1781, and 2559 (as well as documents they superseded)
-
- be moved to Historic status. This memo provides information for the
-
- Internet community.
-
- 3493 Gilligan Mar 2003 Basic Socket Interface
-
Extensions for IPv6
- The de facto standard Application Program Interface (API) for TCP/IP
-
- applications is the "sockets" interface. Although this API was
-
- developed for Unix in the early 1980s it has also been implemented on a
-
- wide variety of non-Unix systems. TCP/IP applications written using the
-
- sockets API have in the past enjoyed a high degree of portability and we
-
- would like the same portability with IPv6 applications. But changes are
-
- required to the sockets API to support IPv6 and this memo describes
-
- these changes. These include a new socket address structure to carry
-
- IPv6 addresses, new address conversion functions, and some new socket
-
- options. These extensions are designed to provide access to the basic
-
- IPv6 features required by TCP and UDP applications, including
-
- multicasting, while introducing a minimum of change into the system and
-
- providing complete compatibility for existing IPv4 applications.
-
- Additional extensions for advanced IPv6 features (raw sockets and access
-
- to the IPv6 extension headers) are defined in another document. This
-
- memo provides information for the Internet community.
-
Page 4
- 3492 Costello Mar 2003 Punycode: A Bootstring
-
encoding of Unicode for
Internationalized Domain Names
in Applications (IDNA)
- Punycode is a simple and efficient transfer encoding syntax designed for
-
- use with Internationalized Domain Names in Applications (IDNA). It
-
- uniquely and reversibly transforms a Unicode string into an ASCII
-
- string. ASCII characters in the Unicode string are represented
-
- literally, and non-ASCII characters are represented by ASCII characters
-
- that are allowed in host name labels (letters, digits, and hyphens).
-
- This document defines a general algorithm called Bootstring that allows
-
- a string of basic code points to uniquely represent any string of code
-
- points drawn from a larger set. Punycode is an instance of Bootstring
-
- that uses particular parameter values specified by this document,
-
- appropriate for IDNA. [STANDARDS TRACK]
-
- 3491 Hoffman Mar 2003 Nameprep: A Stringprep Profile
-
for Internationalized Domain
Names (IDN)
- This document describes how to prepare internationalized domain name
-
(IDN) labels in order to increase the likelihood that name input and
- name comparison work in ways that make sense for typical users
-
- throughout the world. This profile of the stringprep protocol is used
-
- as part of a suite of on-the-wire protocols for internationalizing the
-
- Domain Name System (DNS). [STANDARDS TRACK]
-
- 3490 Faltstrom Mar 2003 Internationalizing Domain
-
Names in Applications (IDNA)
- Until now, there has been no standard method for domain names to use
-
- characters outside the ASCII repertoire. This document defines
-
- internationalized domain names (IDNs) and a mechanism called
-
- Internationalizing Domain Names in Applications (IDNA) for handling them
-
- in a standard fashion. IDNs use characters drawn from a large
-
- repertoire (Unicode), but IDNA allows the non-ASCII characters to be
-
- represented using only the ASCII characters already allowed in so-called
-
- host names today. This backward-compatible representation is required
-
- in existing protocols like DNS, so that IDNs can be introduced with no
-
- changes to the existing infrastructure. IDNA is only meant for
-
- processing domain names, not free text. [STANDARDS TRACK]
-
Page 5
- 3489 Rosenberg Mar 2003 STUN - Simple Traversal of
-
User Datagram Protocol (UDP)
Through Network Address
Translators (NATs)
- Simple Traversal of User Datagram Protocol (UDP) Through Network Address
-
- Translators (NATs) (STUN) is a lightweight protocol that allows
-
- applications to discover the presence and types of NATs and firewalls
-
- between them and the public Internet. It also provides the ability for
-
- applications to determine the public Internet Protocol (IP) addresses
-
- allocated to them by the NAT. STUN works with many existing NATs, and
-
- does not require any special behavior from them. As a result, it allows
-
- a wide variety of applications to work through existing NAT
-
- infrastructure. [STANDARDS TRACK]
-
- 3488 Wu Feb 2003 Cisco Systems Router-port
-
Group Management Protocol
(RGMP)
- This document describes the Router-port Group Management Protocol
-
(RGMP). This protocol was developed by Cisco Systems and is used
- between multicast routers and switches to restrict multicast packet
-
- forwarding in switches to those routers where the packets may be needed.
-
- RGMP is designed for backbone switched networks where multiple, high
-
- speed routers are interconnected. This memo provides information for
-
- the Internet community.
-
- 3487 Schulzrinne Feb 2003 Requirements for Resource
-
Priority Mechanisms for the
Session Initiation Protocol
(SIP)
- This document summarizes requirements for prioritizing access to
-
- circuit-switched network, end system and proxy resources for emergency
-
- preparedness communications using the Session Initiation Protocol (SIP).
-
- This memo provides information for the Internet community.
-
- 3486 Camarillo Feb 2003 Compressing the Session
-
Initiation Protocol (SIP)
- This document describes a mechanism to signal that compression is
-
- desired for one or more Session Initiation Protocol (SIP) messages. It
-
- also states when it is appropriate to send compressed SIP messages to a
-
- SIP entity. [STANDARDS TRACK]
-
Page 6
- 3485 Garcia-Martin Feb 2003 The Session Initiation
-
Protocol (SIP) and Session
Description Protocol
(SDP) Static Dictionary for
Signaling Compression
(SigComp)
- The Session Initiation Protocol (SIP) is a text-based protocol for
-
- initiating and managing communication sessions. The protocol can be
-
- compressed by using Signaling Compression (SigComp). Similarly, the
-
- Session Description Protocol (SDP) is a text-based protocol intended for
-
- describing multimedia sessions for the purposes of session announcement,
-
- session invitation, and other forms of multimedia session initiation.
-
- This memo defines the SIP/SDP-specific static dictionary that SigComp
-
- may use in order to achieve higher efficiency. The dictionary is
-
- compression algorithm independent. [STANDARDS TRACK]
-
- 3484 Draves Feb 2003 Default Address Selection for
-
Internet Protocol version 6
(IPv6)
- This document describes two algorithms, for source address selection and
-
- for destination address selection. The algorithms specify default
-
- behavior for all Internet Protocol version 6 (IPv6) implementations.
-
- They do not override choices made by applications or upper-layer
-
- protocols, nor do they preclude the development of more advanced
-
- mechanisms for address selection. The two algorithms share a common
-
- context, including an optional mechanism for allowing administrators to
-
- provide policy that can override the default behavior. In dual stack
-
- implementations, the destination address selection algorithm can
-
- consider both IPv4 and IPv6 addresses - depending on the available
-
- source addresses, the algorithm might prefer IPv6 addresses over IPv4
-
- addresses, or vice-versa.
-
- All IPv6 nodes, including both hosts and routers, must implement default
-
- address selection as defined in this specification. [STANDARDS TRACK]
-
Page 7
- 3483 Rawlins Mar 2003 Framework for Policy Usage
-
Feedback for Common Open
Policy Service with Policy
Provisioning (COPS-PR)
- Common Open Policy Services (COPS) Protocol (RFC 2748), defines the
-
- capability of reporting information to the Policy Decision Point (PDP).
-
- The types of report information are success, failure and accounting of
-
- an installed state. This document focuses on the COPS Report Type of
-
- Accounting and the necessary framework for the monitoring and reporting
-
- of usage feedback for an installed state. This memo provides
-
- information for the Internet community.
-
- 3482 Foster Feb 2003 Number Portability in the
-
Global Switched Telephone
Network (GSTN): An Overview
- This document provides an overview of E.164 telephone number portability
-
(NP) in the Global Switched Telephone Network (GSTN).
- NP is a regulatory imperative seeking to liberalize local telephony
-
- service competition, by enabling end-users to retain telephone numbers
-
- while changing service providers. NP changes the fundamental nature of
-
- a dialed E.164 number from a hierarchical physical routing address to a
-
- virtual address, thereby requiring the transparent translation of the
-
- later to the former. In addition, there are various regulatory
-
- constraints that establish relevant parameters for NP implementation,
-
- most of which are not network technology specific. Consequently, the
-
- implementation of NP behavior consistent with applicable regulatory
-
- constraints, as well as the need for interoperation with the existing
-
- GSTN NP implementations, are relevant topics for numerous areas of IP
-
- telephony works-in-progress with the IETF. This memo provides
-
- information for the Internet community.
-
Page 8
- 3481 Inamura, Ed. Feb 2003 TCP over Second (2.5G)
-
and Third (3G) Generation
Wireless Networks
- This document describes a profile for optimizing TCP to adapt so that it
-
- handles paths including second (2.5G) and third (3G) generation wireless
-
- networks. It describes the relevant characteristics of 2.5G and 3G
-
- networks, and specific features of example deployments of such networks.
-
- It then recommends TCP algorithm choices for nodes known to be starting
-
- or ending on such paths, and it also discusses open issues. The
-
- configuration options recommended in this document are commonly found in
-
- modern TCP stacks, and are widely available standards-track mechanisms
-
- that the community considers safe for use on the general Internet. This
-
- document specifies an Internet Best Current Practices for the Internet
-
- Community, and requests discussion and suggestions for improvements.
-
- 3480 Kompella Feb 2003 Signalling Unnumbered Links in
-
CR-LDP (Constraint-Routing
Label Distribution Protocol)
- Current signalling used by Multi-Protocol Label Switching Traffic
-
- Engineering (MPLS TE) does not provide support for unnumbered links.
-
- This document defines procedures and extensions to Constraint-Routing
-
- Label Distribution Protocol (CR-LDP), one of the MPLS TE signalling
-
- protocols that are needed in order to support unnumbered links.
-
[STANDARDS TRACK]
- 3479 Farrel, Ed. Feb 2003 Fault Tolerance for the Label
-
Distribution Protocol (LDP)
- Multiprotocol Label Switching (MPLS) systems will be used in core
-
- networks where system downtime must be kept to an absolute minimum.
-
- Many MPLS Label Switching Routers (LSRs) may, therefore, exploit Fault
-
- Tolerant (FT) hardware or software to provide high availability of the
-
- core networks.
-
- The details of how FT is achieved for the various components of an FT
-
- LSR, including Label Distribution Protocol (LDP), the switching hardware
-
- and TCP, are implementation specific. This document identifies issues
-
- in the LDP specification in RFC 3036, "LDP Specification", that make it
-
- difficult to implement an FT LSR using the current LDP protocols, and
-
- defines enhancements to the LDP specification to ease such FT LSR
-
- implementations.
-
Page 9
- The issues and extensions described here are equally applicable to RFC
-
- 3212, "Constraint-Based LSP Setup Using LDP" (CR-LDP). [STANDARDS
-
- TRACK]
-
- 3478 Leelanivas Feb 2003 Graceful Restart Mechanism for
-
Label Distribution Protocol
- This document describes a mechanism that helps to minimize the negative
-
- effects on MPLS traffic caused by Label Switching Router's (LSR's)
-
- control plane restart, specifically by the restart of its Label
-
- Distribution Protocol (LDP) component, on LSRs that are capable of
-
- preserving the MPLS forwarding component across the restart.
-
- The mechanism described in this document is applicable to all LSRs, both
-
- those with the ability to preserve forwarding state during LDP restart
-
- and those without (although the latter needs to implement only a subset
-
- of the mechanism described in this document). Supporting (a subset of)
-
- the mechanism described here by the LSRs that can not preserve their
-
- MPLS forwarding state across the restart would not reduce the negative
-
- impact on MPLS traffic caused by their control plane restart, but it
-
- would minimize the impact if their neighbor(s) are capable of preserving
-
- the forwarding state across the restart of their control plane and
-
- implement the mechanism described here.
-
- The mechanism makes minimalistic assumptions on what has to be preserved
-
- across restart - the mechanism assumes that only the actual MPLS
-
- forwarding state has to be preserved; the mechanism does not require any
-
- of the LDP-related states to be preserved across the restart.
-
- The procedures described in this document apply to downstream
-
- unsolicited label distribution. Extending these procedures to
-
- downstream on demand label distribution is for further study.
-
[STANDARDS TRACK]
- 3477 Kompella Jan 2003 Signalling Unnumbered Links in
-
Resource ReSerVation Protocol -
Traffic Engineering (RSVP-TE)
- Current signalling used by Multi-Protocol Label Switching Traffic
-
- Engineering (MPLS TE) does not provide support for unnumbered links.
-
- This document defines procedures and extensions to Resource ReSerVation
-
- Protocol (RSVP) for Label Switched Path (LSP) Tunnels (RSVP-TE), one of
-
- the MPLS TE signalling protocols, that are needed in order to support
-
- unnumbered links. [STANDARDS TRACK]
-
Page 10
- 3476 Rajagopalan Mar 2003 Documentation of IANA
-
Assignments for Label
Distribution Protocol
(LDP), Resource ReSerVation
Protocol (RSVP), and Resource
ReSerVation Protocol-Traffic
Engineering (RSVP-TE)
Extensions for Optical UNI
Signaling
- The Optical Interworking Forum (OIF) has defined extensions to the Label
-
- Distribution Protocol (LDP) and the Resource ReSerVation Protocol (RSVP)
-
- for optical User Network Interface (UNI) signaling. These extensions
-
- consist of a set of new data objects and error codes. This document
-
- describes these extensions. This memo provides information for the
-
- Internet community.
-
- 3475 Aboul-Magd Mar 2003 Documentation of IANA
-
assignments for
Constraint-Based LSP setup
using LDP (CR-LDP) Extensions
for Automatic Switched Optical
Network (ASON)
- Automatic Switched Optical Network (ASON) is an architecture, specified
-
- by ITU-T Study Group 15, for the introduction of a control plane for
-
- optical networks. The ASON architecture specifies a set of reference
-
- points that defines the relationship between the ASON architectural
-
- entities. Signaling over interfaces defined in those reference points
-
- can make use of protocols that are defined by the IETF in the context of
-
- Generalized Multi-Protocol Label Switching (GMPLS) work. This document
-
- describes Constraint-Based LSP setup using LDP (CR-LDP) extensions for
-
- signaling over the interfaces defined in the ASON reference points. The
-
- purpose of the document is to request that the IANA assigns code points
-
- necessary for the CR-LDP extensions. The protocol specifications for
-
- the use of the CR-LDP extensions are found in ITU-T documents. This
-
- memo provides information for the Internet community.
-
Page 11
- 3474 Lin Mar 2003 Documentation of IANA
-
assignments for Generalized
MultiProtocol Label Switching
(GMPLS) Resource Reservation
Protocol - Traffic Engineering
(RSVP-TE) Usage and Extensions
for Automatically Switched
Optical Network (ASON)
- The Generalized MultiProtocol Label Switching (GMPLS) suite of protocol
-
- specifications has been defined to provide support for different
-
- technologies as well as different applications. These include support
-
- for requesting TDM connections based on Synchronous Optical
-
- NETwork/Synchronous Digital Hierarchy (SONET/SDH) as well as Optical
-
- Transport Networks (OTNs).
-
- This document concentrates on the signaling aspects of the GMPLS suite
-
- of protocols, specifically GMPLS signaling using Resource Reservation
-
- Protocol - Traffic Engineering (RSVP-TE). It proposes additional
-
- extensions to these signaling protocols to support the capabilities of
-
- an ASON network.
-
- This document proposes appropriate extensions towards the resolution of
-
- additional requirements identified and communicated by the ITU-T Study
-
- Group 15 in support of ITU's ASON standardization effort. This memo
-
- provides information for the Internet community.
-
- 3473 Berger Jan 2003 Generalized Multi-Protocol
-
Label Switching (GMPLS)
Signaling Resource ReserVation
Protocol-Traffic Engineering
(RSVP-TE) Extensions
- This document describes extensions to Multi-Protocol Label Switching
-
(MPLS) Resource ReserVation Protocol - Traffic Engineering (RSVP-TE)
- signaling required to support Generalized MPLS. Generalized MPLS
-
- extends the MPLS control plane to encompass time-division (e.g.,
-
- Synchronous Optical Network and Synchronous Digital Hierarchy,
-
- SONET/SDH), wavelength (optical lambdas) and spatial switching (e.g.,
-
- incoming port or fiber to outgoing port or fiber). This document
-
- presents a RSVP-TE specific description of the extensions. A generic
-
- functional description can be found in separate documents. [STANDARDS
-
- TRACK]
-
Page 12
- 3472 Ashwood-Smith Jan 2003 Generalized Multi-Protocol
-
Label Switching (GMPLS)
Signaling Constraint-based
Routed Label Distribution
Protocol (CR-LDP) Extensions
- This document describes extensions to Multi-Protocol Label Switching
-
(MPLS) Constraint-based Routed Label Distribution Protocol (CR-LDP)
- signaling required to support Generalized MPLS. Generalized MPLS
-
- extends the MPLS control plane to encompass time-division (e.g.,
-
- Synchronous Optical Network and Synchronous Digital Hierarchy,
-
- SONET/SDH), wavelength (optical lambdas) and spatial switching (e.g.,
-
- incoming port or fiber to outgoing port or fiber). This document
-
- presents a CR-LDP specific description of the extensions. A generic
-
- functional description can be found in separate documents. [STANDARDS
-
- TRACK]
-
- 3471 Berger Jan 2003 Generalized Multi-Protocol
-
Label Switching (GMPLS)
Signaling Functional
Description
- This document describes extensions to Multi-Protocol Label Switching
-
(MPLS) signaling required to support Generalized MPLS. Generalized MPLS
- extends the MPLS control plane to encompass time-division (e.g.,
-
- Synchronous Optical Network and Synchronous Digital Hierarchy,
-
- SONET/SDH), wavelength (optical lambdas) and spatial switching (e.g.,
-
- incoming port or fiber to outgoing port or fiber). This document
-
- presents a functional description of the extensions. Protocol specific
-
- formats and mechanisms, and technology specific details are specified in
-
- separate documents. [STANDARDS TRACK]
-
- 3470 Hollenbeck Jan 2003 Guidelines for the Use
-
of Extensible Markup
Language (XML)
within IETF Protocols
- The Extensible Markup Language (XML) is a framework for structuring
-
- data. While it evolved from Standard Generalized Markup Language (SGML)
-
-- a markup language primarily focused on structuring documents -- XML
- has evolved to be a widely-used mechanism for representing structured
-
- data.
-
Page 13
- There are a wide variety of Internet protocols being developed; many
-
- have need for a representation for structured data relevant to their
-
- application. There has been much interest in the use of XML as a
-
- representation method. This document describes basic XML concepts,
-
- analyzes various alternatives in the use of XML, and provides guidelines
-
- for the use of XML within IETF standards-track protocols. This document
-
- specifies an Internet Best Current Practices for the Internet Community,
-
- and requests discussion and suggestions for improvements.
-
- 3469 Sharma, Ed. Feb 2003 Framework for Multi-Protocol
-
Label Switching (MPLS)-based
Recovery
- Multi-protocol label switching (MPLS) integrates the label swapping
-
- forwarding paradigm with network layer routing. To deliver reliable
-
- service, MPLS requires a set of procedures to provide protection of the
-
- traffic carried on different paths. This requires that the label
-
- switching routers (LSRs) support fault detection, fault notification,
-
- and fault recovery mechanisms, and that MPLS signaling support the
-
- configuration of recovery. With these objectives in mind, this document
-
- specifies a framework for MPLS based recovery. Restart issues are not
-
- included in this framework. This memo provides information for the
-
- Internet community.
-
- 3468 Andersson Feb 2003 The Multiprotocol Label
-
Switching (MPLS) Working Group
decision on MPLS signaling
protocols
- This document documents the consensus reached by the Multiprotocol Label
-
- Switching (MPLS) Working Group within the IETF to focus its efforts on
-
"Resource Reservation Protocol (RSVP)-TE: Extensions to RSVP for Label-
- Switched Paths (LSP) Tunnels" (RFC 3209) as the MPLS signalling protocol
-
- for traffic engineering applications and to undertake no new efforts
-
- relating to "Constraint-Based LSP Setup using Label Distribution
-
- Protocol (LDP)" (RFC 3212). The recommendations of section 6 have been
-
- accepted by the IESG. This memo provides information for the Internet
-
- community.
-
Page 14
- 3467 Klensin Feb 2003 Role of the Domain Name System
-
(DNS)
- This document reviews the original function and purpose of the domain
-
- name system (DNS). It contrasts that history with some of the purposes
-
- for which the DNS has recently been applied and some of the newer
-
- demands being placed upon it or suggested for it. A framework for an
-
- alternative to placing these additional stresses on the DNS is then
-
- outlined. This document and that framework are not a proposed solution,
-
- only a strong suggestion that the time has come to begin thinking more
-
- broadly about the problems we are encountering and possible approaches
-
- to solving them. This memo provides information for the Internet
-
- community.
-
- 3466 Day Feb 2003 A Model for Content
-
Internetworking (CDI)
- Content (distribution) internetworking (CDI) is the technology for
-
- interconnecting content networks, sometimes previously called "content
-
- peering" or "CDN peering". A common vocabulary helps the process of
-
- discussing such interconnection and interoperation. This document
-
- introduces content networks and content internetworking, and defines
-
- elements for such a common vocabulary. This memo provides information
-
- for the Internet community.
-
- 3465 Allman Feb 2003 TCP Congestion Control with
-
Appropriate Byte Counting
(ABC)
- This document proposes a small modification to the way TCP increases its
-
- congestion window. Rather than the traditional method of increasing the
-
- congestion window by a constant amount for each arriving acknowledgment,
-
- the document suggests basing the increase on the number of previously
-
- unacknowledged bytes each ACK covers. This change improves the
-
- performance of TCP, as well as closes a security hole TCP receivers can
-
- use to induce the sender into increasing the sending rate too rapidly.
-
- This memo defines an Experimental Protocol for the Internet community.
-
Page 15
- 3464 Moore Jan 2003 An Extensible Message Format
-
for Delivery Status
Notifications
- This memo defines a Multipurpose Internet Mail Extensions (MIME)
-
- content-type that may be used by a message transfer agent (MTA) or
-
- electronic mail gateway to report the result of an attempt to deliver a
-
- message to one or more recipients. This content-type is intended as a
-
- machine-processable replacement for the various types of delivery status
-
- notifications currently used in Internet electronic mail.
-
- Because many messages are sent between the Internet and other messaging
-
- systems (such as X.400 or the so-called "Local Area Network (LAN)-based"
-
- systems), the Delivery Status Notification (DSN) protocol is designed to
-
- be useful in a multi-protocol messaging environment. To this end, the
-
- protocol described in this memo provides for the carriage of "foreign"
-
- addresses and error codes, in addition to those normally used in
-
- Internet mail. Additional attributes may also be defined to support
-
"tunneling" of foreign notifications through Internet mail. [STANDARDS
- TRACK]
-
- 3463 Vaudreuil Jan 2003 Enhanced Mail System Status
-
Codes
- This document defines a set of extended status codes for use within the
-
- mail system for delivery status reports, tracking, and improved
-
- diagnostics. In combination with other information provided in the
-
- Delivery Status Notification (DSN) delivery report, these codes
-
- facilitate media and language independent rendering of message delivery
-
- status. [STANDARDS TRACK]
-
- 3462 Vaudreuil Jan 2003 The Multipart/Report Content
-
Type for the Reporting of
Mail System Administrative
Messages
- The Multipart/Report Multipurpose Internet Mail Extensions (MIME)
-
- content-type is a general "family" or "container" type for electronic
-
- mail reports of any kind. Although this memo defines only the use of
-
- the Multipart/Report content-type with respect to delivery status
-
- reports, mail processing programs will benefit if a single content-type
-
- is used to for all kinds of reports.
-
Page 16
- This document is part of a four document set describing the delivery
-
- status report service. This collection includes the Simple Mail
-
- Transfer Protocol (SMTP) extensions to request delivery status reports,
-
- a MIME content for the reporting of delivery reports, an enumeration of
-
- extended status codes, and a multipart container for the delivery
-
- report, the original message, and a human-friendly summary of the
-
- failure. [STANDARDS TRACK]
-
- 3461 Moore Jan 2003 Simple Mail Transfer Protocol
-
(SMTP) Service Extension
for Delivery Status
Notifications (DSNs)
- This memo defines an extension to the Simple Mail Transfer Protocol
-
(SMTP) service, which allows an SMTP client to specify (a) that Delivery
- Status Notifications (DSNs) should be generated under certain
-
- conditions, (b) whether such notifications should return the contents of
-
- the message, and (c) additional information, to be returned with a DSN,
-
- that allows the sender to identify both the recipient(s) for which the
-
- DSN was issued, and the transaction in which the original message was
-
- sent. [STANDARDS TRACK]
-
- 3460 Moore Jan 2003 Policy Core Information Model
-
(PCIM) Extensions
- This document specifies a number of changes to the Policy Core
-
- Information Model (PCIM, RFC 3060). Two types of changes are included.
-
- First, several completely new elements are introduced, for example,
-
- classes for header filtering, that extend PCIM into areas that it did
-
- not previously cover. Second, there are cases where elements of PCIM
-
(for example, policy rule priorities) are deprecated, and replacement
- elements are defined (in this case, priorities tied to associations that
-
- refer to policy rules). Both types of changes are done in such a way
-
- that, to the extent possible, interoperability with implementations of
-
- the original PCIM model is preserved. This document updates RFC 3060.
-
[STANDARDS TRACK]
- 3459 Burger Jan 2003 Critical Content Multi-purpose
-
Internet Mail Extensions
(MIME) Parameter
- This document describes the use of a mechanism for identifying body
-
- parts that a sender deems critical in a multi-part Internet mail
-
- message. The mechanism described is a parameter to Content-Disposition,
-
- as described by RFC 3204.
-
Page 17
- By knowing what parts of a message the sender deems critical, a content
-
- gateway can intelligently handle multi-part messages when providing
-
- gateway services to systems of lesser capability. Critical content can
-
- help a content gateway to decide what parts to forward. It can indicate
-
- how hard a gateway should try to deliver a body part. It can help the
-
- gateway to pick body parts that are safe to silently delete when a
-
- system of lesser capability receives a message. In addition, critical
-
- content can help the gateway chose the notification strategy for the
-
- receiving system. Likewise, if the sender expects the destination to do
-
- some processing on a body part, critical content allows the sender to
-
- mark body parts that the receiver must process. [STANDARDS TRACK]
-
- 3458 Burger Jan 2003 Message Context for Internet
-
Mail
- This memo describes a new RFC 2822 message header, "Message-Context".
-
- This header provides information about the context and presentation
-
- characteristics of a message.
-
- A receiving user agent (UA) may use this information as a hint to
-
- optimally present the message. [STANDARDS TRACK]
-
- 3457 Kelly Jan 2003 Requirements for IPsec Remote
-
Access Scenarios
- IPsec offers much promise as a secure remote access mechanism. However,
-
- there are a number of differing remote access scenarios, each having
-
- some shared and some unique requirements. A thorough understanding of
-
- these requirements is necessary in order to effectively evaluate the
-
- suitability of a specific set of mechanisms for any particular remote
-
- access scenario. This document enumerates the requirements for a number
-
- of common remote access scenarios. This memo provides information for
-
- the Internet community.
-
Page 18
- 3456 Patel Jan 2003 Dynamic Host Configuration
-
Protocol (DHCPv4)
Configuration of IPsec Tunnel
Mode
- This memo explores the requirements for host configuration in IPsec
-
- tunnel mode, and describes how the Dynamic Host Configuration Protocol
-
(DHCPv4) may be leveraged for configuration. In many remote access
- scenarios, a mechanism for making the remote host appear to be present
-
- on the local corporate network is quite useful. This may be
-
- accomplished by assigning the host a "virtual" address from the
-
- corporate network, and then tunneling traffic via IPsec from the host's
-
- ISP-assigned address to the corporate security gateway. In IPv4, DHCP
-
- provides for such remote host configuration. [STANDARDS TRACK]
-
- 3455 Garcia-Martin Jan 2003 Private Header (P-Header)
-
Extensions to the Session
Initiation Protocol (SIP) for
the 3rd-Generation Partnership
Project (3GPP)
- This document describes a set of private Session Initiation Protocol
-
(SIP) headers (P-headers) used by the 3rd-Generation Partnership Project
(3GPP), along with their applicability, which is limited to particular
- environments. The P-headers are for a variety of purposes within the
-
- networks that the partners use, including charging and information about
-
- the networks a call traverses. This memo provides information for the
-
- Internet community.
-
- 3454 Hoffman Dec 2002 Preparation of
-
Internationalized Strings
("stringprep")
- This document describes a framework for preparing Unicode text strings
-
- in order to increase the likelihood that string input and string
-
- comparison work in ways that make sense for typical users throughout the
-
- world. The stringprep protocol is useful for protocol identifier
-
- values, company and personal names, internationalized domain names, and
-
- other text strings.
-
- This document does not specify how protocols should prepare text
-
- strings. Protocols must create profiles of stringprep in order to fully
-
- specify the processing options. [STANDARDS TRACK]
-
Page 19
- 3453 Luby Dec 2002 The Use of Forward Error
-
Correction (FEC) in Reliable
Multicast
- This memo describes the use of Forward Error Correction (FEC) codes to
-
- efficiently provide and/or augment reliability for one-to-many reliable
-
- data transport using IP multicast. One of the key properties of FEC
-
- codes in this context is the ability to use the same packets containing
-
- FEC data to simultaneously repair different packet loss patterns at
-
- multiple receivers. Different classes of FEC codes and some of their
-
- basic properties are described and terminology relevant to implementing
-
- FEC in a reliable multicast protocol is introduced. Examples are
-
- provided of possible abstract formats for packets carrying FEC. This
-
- memo provides information for the Internet community.
-
- 3452 Luby Dec 2002 Forward Error Correction (FEC)
-
Building Block
- This document generally describes how to use Forward Error Correction
-
(FEC) codes to efficiently provide and/or augment reliability for data
- transport. The primary focus of this document is the application of FEC
-
- codes to one-to-many reliable data transport using IP multicast. This
-
- document describes what information is needed to identify a specific FEC
-
- code, what information needs to be communicated out-of-band to use the
-
- FEC code, and what information is needed in data packets to identify the
-
- encoding symbols they carry. The procedures for specifying FEC codes
-
- and registering them with the Internet Assigned Numbers Authority (IANA)
-
- are also described. This document should be read in conjunction with
-
- and uses the terminology of the companion document titled, "The Use of
-
- Forward Error Correction (FEC) in Reliable Multicast". This memo
-
- defines an Experimental Protocol for the Internet community.
-
- 3451 Luby Dec 2002 Layered Coding Transport (LCT)
-
Building Block
- Layered Coding Transport (LCT) provides transport level support for
-
- reliable content delivery and stream delivery protocols. LCT is
-
- specifically designed to support protocols using IP multicast, but also
-
- provides support to protocols that use unicast. LCT is compatible with
-
- congestion control that provides multiple rate delivery to receivers and
-
- is also compatible with coding techniques that provide reliable delivery
-
- of content. This memo defines an Experimental Protocol for the Internet
-
- community.
-
Page 20
- 3450 Luby Dec 2002 Asynchronous Layered Coding
-
(ALC) Protocol Instantiation
- This document describes the Asynchronous Layered Coding (ALC) protocol,
-
- a massively scalable reliable content delivery protocol. Asynchronous
-
- Layered Coding combines the Layered Coding Transport (LCT) building
-
- block, a multiple rate congestion control building block and the Forward
-
- Error Correction (FEC) building block to provide congestion controlled
-
- reliable asynchronous delivery of content to an unlimited number of
-
- concurrent receivers from a single sender. This memo defines an
-
- Experimental Protocol for the Internet community.
-
- 3449 Balakrishnan Dec 2002 TCP Performance Implications
-
of Network Path Asymmetry
- This document describes TCP performance problems that arise because of
-
- asymmetric effects. These problems arise in several access networks,
-
- including bandwidth-asymmetric networks and packet radio subnetworks,
-
- for different underlying reasons. However, the end result on TCP
-
- performance is the same in both cases: performance often degrades
-
- significantly because of imperfection and variability in the ACK
-
- feedback from the receiver to the sender.
-
- The document details several mitigations to these effects, which have
-
- either been proposed or evaluated in the literature, or are currently
-
- deployed in networks. These solutions use a combination of local link-
-
- layer techniques, subnetwork, and end-to-end mechanisms, consisting of:
-
(i) techniques to manage the channel used for the upstream bottleneck
- link carrying the ACKs, typically using header compression or reducing
-
- the frequency of TCP ACKs, (ii) techniques to handle this reduced ACK
-
- frequency to retain the TCP sender's acknowledgment-triggered self-
-
- clocking and (iii) techniques to schedule the data and ACK packets in
-
- the reverse direction to improve performance in the presence of two-way
-
- traffic. Each technique is described, together with known issues, and
-
- recommendations for use. A summary of the recommendations is provided
-
- at the end of the document. This document specifies an Internet Best
-
- Current Practices for the Internet Community, and requests discussion
-
- and suggestions for improvements.
-
Page 21
- 3448 Handley Jan 2003 TCP Friendly Rate Control
-
(TFRC): Protocol Specification
- This document specifies TCP-Friendly Rate Control (TFRC). TFRC is a
-
- congestion control mechanism for unicast flows operating in a best-
-
- effort Internet environment. It is reasonably fair when competing for
-
- bandwidth with TCP flows, but has a much lower variation of throughput
-
- over time compared with TCP, making it more suitable for applications
-
- such as telephony or streaming media where a relatively smooth sending
-
- rate is of importance. [STANDARDS TRACK]
-
- 3447 Jonsson Feb 2003 Public-Key Cryptography
-
Standards (PKCS) #1: RSA
Cryptography Specifications
Version 2.1
- This memo represents a republication of PKCS #1 v2.1 from RSA
-
- Laboratories' Public-Key Cryptography Standards (PKCS) series, and
-
- change control is retained within the PKCS process. The body of this
-
- document is taken directly from the PKCS #1 v2.1 document, with certain
-
- corrections made during the publication process. This memo provides
-
- information for the Internet community.
-
- 3446 Kim Jan 2003 Anycast Rendevous Point (RP)
-
mechanism using Protocol
Independent Multicast (PIM)
and Multicast Source Discovery
Protocol (MSDP)
- This document describes a mechanism to allow for an arbitrary number of
-
- Rendevous Points (RPs) per group in a single shared-tree Protocol
-
- Independent Multicast-Sparse Mode (PIM-SM) domain. This memo provides
-
- information for the Internet community.
-
Page 22
- 3445 Massey Dec 2002 Limiting the Scope of the KEY
-
Resource Record (RR)
- This document limits the Domain Name System (DNS) KEY Resource Record
-
(RR) to only keys used by the Domain Name System Security Extensions
(DNSSEC). The original KEY RR used sub-typing to store both DNSSEC keys
- and arbitrary application keys. Storing both DNSSEC and application
-
- keys with the same record type is a mistake. This document removes
-
- application keys from the KEY record by redefining the Protocol Octet
-
- field in the KEY RR Data. As a result of removing application keys, all
-
- but one of the flags in the KEY record become unnecessary and are
-
- redefined. Three existing application key sub-types are changed to
-
- reserved, but the format of the KEY record is not changed. This
-
- document updates RFC 2535. [STANDARDS TRACK]
-
- 3444 Pras Jan 2003 On the Difference between
-
Information Models and Data
Models
- There has been ongoing confusion about the differences between
-
- Information Models and Data Models for defining managed objects in
-
- network management. This document explains the differences between
-
- these terms by analyzing how existing network management model
-
- specifications (from the IETF and other bodies such as the International
-
- Telecommunication Union (ITU) or the Distributed Management Task Force
-
(DMTF)) fit into the universe of Information Models and Data Models.
- This memo documents the main results of the 8th workshop of the Network
-
- Management Research Group (NMRG) of the Internet Research Task Force
-
(IRTF) hosted by the University of Texas at Austin. This memo provides
- information for the Internet community.
-
- 3443 Agarwal Jan 2003 Time To Live (TTL) Processing
-
in Multi-Protocol Label
Switching (MPLS) Networks
- This document describes Time To Live (TTL) processing in hierarchical
-
- Multi-Protocol Label Switching (MPLS) networks and is motivated by the
-
- need to formalize a TTL-transparent mode of operation for an MPLS
-
- label-switched path. It updates RFC 3032, "MPLS Label Stack Encoding".
-
- TTL processing in both Pipe and Uniform Model hierarchical tunnels are
-
- specified with examples for both "push" and "pop" cases. The document
-
- also complements RFC 3270, "MPLS Support of Differentiated Services" and
-
- ties together the terminology introduced in that document with TTL
-
- processing in hierarchical MPLS networks. [STANDARDS TRACK]
-
Page 23
- 3442 Lemon Dec 2002 The Classless Static Route
-
Option for Dynamic Host
Configuration Protocol (DHCP)
version 4
- This document defines a new Dynamic Host Configuration Protocol (DHCP)
-
- option which is passed from the DHCP Server to the DHCP Client to
-
- configure a list of static routes in the client. The network
-
- destinations in these routes are classless - each routing table entry
-
- includes a subnet mask. [STANDARDS TRACK]
-
- 3441 Kumar Jan 03 Asynchronous Transfer Mode
-
(ATM) Package for the Media
Gateway Control Protocol
(MGCP)
- This document describes an Asynchronous Transfer Mode (ATM) package for
-
- the Media Gateway Control Protocol (MGCP). This package includes new
-
- Local Connection Options, ATM-specific events and signals, and ATM
-
- connection parameters. Also included is a description of codec and
-
- profile negotiation. It extends the MGCP that is currently being
-
- deployed in a number of products. Implementers should be aware of
-
- developments in the IETF Megaco Working Group and ITU SG16, which are
-
- currently working on a potential successor to this protocol. This memo
-
- provides information for the Internet community.
-
- 3440 Ly Dec 2002 Definitions of Extension
-
Managed Objects for Asymmetric
Digital Subscriber Lines
- This memo defines a portion of the Management Information Base (MIB) for
-
- use with network management protocols in the Internet community. In
-
- particular, it describes additional managed objects used for managing
-
- Asymmetric Digital Subscriber Line (ADSL) interfaces not covered by the
-
- ADSL Line MIB (RFC 2662). [STANDARDS TRACK]
-
Page 24
- 3439 Bush Dec 2002 Some Internet Architectural
-
Guidelines and Philosophy
- This document extends RFC 1958 by outlining some of the philosophical
-
- guidelines to which architects and designers of Internet backbone
-
- networks should adhere. We describe the Simplicity Principle, which
-
- states that complexity is the primary mechanism that impedes efficient
-
- scaling, and discuss its implications on the architecture, design and
-
- engineering issues found in large scale Internet backbones. This memo
-
- provides information for the Internet community.
-
- 3438 Townsley Dec 2002 Layer Two Tunneling Protocol
-
(L2TP) Internet Assigned
Numbers Authority (IANA)
Considerations Update
- This document describes updates to the Internet Assigned Numbers
-
- Authority (IANA) considerations for the Layer Two Tunneling Protocol
-
(L2TP). This document specifies an Internet Best Current Practices for
- the Internet Community, and requests discussion and suggestions for
-
- improvements.
-
- 3437 Palter Dec 2002 Layer-Two Tunneling Protocol
-
Extensions for PPP Link
Control Protocol Negotiation
- This document defines extensions to the Layer Two Tunneling Protocol
-
(L2TP) for enhanced support of link-specific Point to Point Protocol
(PPP) options. PPP endpoints typically have direct access to the common
- physical media connecting them and thus have detailed knowledge about
-
- the media that is in use. When the L2TP is used, the two PPP peers are
-
- no longer directly connected over the same physical media. Instead,
-
- L2TP inserts a virtual connection over some or all of the PPP connection
-
- by tunneling PPP frames over a packet switched network such as IP.
-
- Under some conditions, an L2TP endpoint may need to negotiate PPP Link
-
- Control Protocol (LCP) options at a location which may not have access
-
- to all of the media information necessary for proper participation in
-
- the LCP negotiation. This document provides a mechanism for
-
- communicating desired LCP options between L2TP endpoints in advance of
-
- PPP LCP negotiation at the far end of an L2TP tunnel, as well as a
-
- mechanism for communicating the negotiated LCP options back to where the
-
- native PPP link resides. [STANDARDS TRACK]
-
Page 25
- 3436 Jungmaier Dec 2002 Transport Layer Security over
-
Stream Control Transmission
Protocol
- This document describes the usage of the Transport Layer Security (TLS)
-
- protocol, as defined in RFC 2246, over the Stream Control Transmission
-
- Protocol (SCTP), as defined in RFC 2960 and RFC 3309.
-
- The user of TLS can take advantage of the features provided by SCTP,
-
- namely the support of multiple streams to avoid head of line blocking
-
- and the support of multi-homing to provide network level fault
-
- tolerance.
-
- Additionally, discussions of extensions of SCTP are also supported,
-
- meaning especially the support of dynamic reconfiguration of IP-
-
- addresses. [STANDARDS TRACK]
-
- 3435 Andreasen Jan 03 Media Gateway Control Protocol
-
(MGCP) Version 1.0
- This document describes an application programming interface and a
-
- corresponding protocol (MGCP) which is used between elements of a
-
- decomposed multimedia gateway. The decomposed multimedia gateway
-
- consists of a Call Agent, which contains the call control
-
"intelligence", and a media gateway which contains the media functions,
- e.g., conversion from TDM voice to Voice over IP.
-
- Media gateways contain endpoints on which the Call Agent can create,
-
- modify and delete connections in order to establish and control media
-
- sessions with other multimedia endpoints. Also, the Call Agent can
-
- instruct the endpoints to detect certain events and generate signals.
-
- The endpoints automatically communicate changes in service state to the
-
- Call Agent. Furthermore, the Call Agent can audit endpoints as well as
-
- the connections on endpoints.
-
- The basic and general MGCP protocol is defined in this document, however
-
- most media gateways will need to implement one or more MGCP packages,
-
- which define extensions to the protocol suitable for use with specific
-
- types of media gateways. Such packages are defined in separate
-
- documents. This memo provides information for the Internet community.
-
Page 26
- 3434 Bierman Dec 2002 Remote Monitoring MIB
-
Extensions for High Capacity
Alarms
- This memo defines a portion of the Management Information Base (MIB) for
-
- use with network management protocols in the Internet community. In
-
- particular, it describes managed objects for extending the alarm
-
- thresholding capabilities found in the Remote Monitoring (RMON) MIB (RFC
-
- 2819), to provide similar threshold monitoring of objects based on the
-
- Counter64 data type. [STANDARDS TRACK]
-
- 3433 Bierman Dec 2002 Entity Sensor Management
-
Information Base
- This memo defines a portion of the Management Information Base (MIB) for
-
- use with network management protocols in the Internet community. In
-
- particular, it describes managed objects for extending the Entity MIB
-
(RFC 2737) to provide generalized access to information related to
- physical sensors, which are often found in networking equipment (such as
-
- chassis temperature, fan RPM, power supply voltage). [STANDARDS TRACK]
-
- 3432 Raisanen Nov 2002 Network performance
-
measurement with periodic
streams
- This memo describes a periodic sampling method and relevant metrics for
-
- assessing the performance of IP networks. First, the memo motivates
-
- periodic sampling and addresses the question of its value as an
-
- alternative to the Poisson sampling described in RFC 2330. The benefits
-
- include applicability to active and passive measurements, simulation of
-
- constant bit rate (CBR) traffic (typical of multimedia communication, or
-
- nearly CBR, as found with voice activity detection), and several
-
- instances in which analysis can be simplified. The sampling method
-
- avoids predictability by mandating random start times and finite length
-
- tests. Following descriptions of the sampling method and sample metric
-
- parameters, measurement methods and errors are discussed. Finally, we
-
- give additional information on periodic measurements, including security
-
- considerations. [STANDARDS TRACK]
-
Page 27
- 3431 Segmuller Dec 2002 Sieve Extension: Relational
-
Tests
- This document describes the RELATIONAL extension to the Sieve mail
-
- filtering language defined in RFC 3028. This extension extends existing
-
- conditional tests in Sieve to allow relational operators. In addition
-
- to testing their content, it also allows for testing of the number of
-
- entities in header and envelope fields. [STANDARDS TRACK]
-
- 3430 Schoenwaelder Dec 2002 Simple Network Management
-
Protocol (SNMP) over
Transmission Control Protocol
(TCP) Transport Mapping
- This memo defines a transport mapping for using the Simple Network
-
- Management Protocol (SNMP) over TCP. The transport mapping can be used
-
- with any version of SNMP. This document extends the transport mappings
-
- defined in STD 62, RFC 3417. This memo defines an Experimental Protocol
-
- for the Internet community.
-
- 3429 Ohta Nov 2002 Assignment of the 'OAM Alert
-
Label' forMultiprotocol Label
Switching Architecture (MPLS)
Operation and Maintenance
(OAM) Functions
- This document describes the assignment of one of the reserved label
-
- values defined in RFC 3032 (MPLS label stack encoding) to the 'Operation
-
- and Maintenance (OAM) Alert Label' that is used by user-plane
-
- Multiprotocol Label Switching Architecture (MPLS) OAM functions for
-
- identification of MPLS OAM packets. This memo provides information for
-
- the Internet community.
-
- 3428 Campbell Dec 2002 Session Initiation Protocol
-
(SIP) Extension for Instant
Messaging
- Instant Messaging (IM) refers to the transfer of messages between users
-
- in near real-time. These messages are usually, but not required to be,
-
- short. IMs are often used in a conversational mode, that is, the
-
- transfer of messages back and forth is fast enough for participants to
-
- maintain an interactive conversation.
-
Page 28
- This document proposes the MESSAGE method, an extension to the Session
-
- Initiation Protocol (SIP) that allows the transfer of Instant Messages.
-
- Since the MESSAGE request is an extension to SIP, it inherits all the
-
- request routing and security features of that protocol. MESSAGE
-
- requests carry the content in the form of MIME body parts. MESSAGE
-
- requests do not themselves initiate a SIP dialog; under normal usage
-
- each Instant Message stands alone, much like pager messages. MESSAGE
-
- requests may be sent in the context of a dialog initiated by some other
-
- SIP request. [STANDARDS TRACK]
-
- 3427 Mankin Dec 2002 Change Process for the Session
-
Initiation Protocol (SIP)
- This memo documents a process intended to apply architectural discipline
-
- to the future development of the Session Initiation Protocol (SIP).
-
- There have been concerns with regards to new SIP proposals.
-
- Specifically, that the addition of new SIP features can be damaging
-
- towards security and/or greatly increase the complexity of the protocol.
-
- The Transport Area directors, along with the SIP and Session Initiation
-
- Proposal Investigation (SIPPING) working group chairs, have provided
-
- suggestions for SIP modifications and extensions. This document
-
- specifies an Internet Best Current Practices for the Internet Community,
-
- and requests discussion and suggestions for improvements.
-
- 3426 Floyd Nov 2002 General Architectural and
-
Policy Considerations
- This document suggests general architectural and policy questions that
-
- the IETF community has to address when working on new standards and
-
- protocols. We note that this document contains questions to be
-
- addressed, as opposed to guidelines or architectural principles to be
-
- followed. This memo provides information for the Internet community.
-
- 3425 Lawrence Nov 2002 Obsoleting IQUERY
-
- The IQUERY method of performing inverse DNS lookups, specified in RFC
-
- 1035, has not been generally implemented and has usually been
-
- operationally disabled where it has been implemented. Both reflect a
-
- general view in the community that the concept was unwise and that the
-
- widely-used alternate approach of using pointer (PTR) queries and
-
- reverse-mapping records is preferable. Consequently, this document
-
- deprecates the IQUERY operation, declaring it entirely obsolete. This
-
- document updates RFC 1035. [STANDARDS TRACK]
-
Page 29
- 3424 Daigle Nov 2002 IAB Considerations for
-
UNilateral Self-Address Fixing
(UNSAF) Across Network Address
Translation
- As a result of the nature of Network Address Translation (NAT)
-
- Middleboxes, communicating endpoints that are separated by one or more
-
- NATs do not know how to refer to themselves using addresses that are
-
- valid in the addressing realms of their (current and future) peers.
-
- Various proposals have been made for "UNilateral Self-Address Fixing
-
(UNSAF)" processes. These are processes whereby some originating
- endpoint attempts to determine or fix the address (and port) by which it
-
- is known to another endpoint - e.g., to be able to use address data in
-
- the protocol exchange, or to advertise a public address from which it
-
- will receive connections.
-
- This document outlines the reasons for which these proposals can be
-
- considered at best as short term fixes to specific problems and the
-
- specific issues to be carefully evaluated before creating an UNSAF
-
- proposal. This memo provides information for the Internet community.
-
- 3423 Zhang Nov 2002 XACCT's Common Reliable
-
Accounting for Network Element
(CRANE) Protocol Specification
Version 1.0
- This document defines the Common Reliable Accounting for Network Element
-
(CRANE) protocol that enables efficient and reliable delivery of any
- data, mainly accounting data from Network Elements to any systems, such
-
- as mediation systems and Business Support Systems (BSS)/ Operations
-
- Support Systems (OSS). The protocol is developed to address the
-
- critical needs for exporting high volume of accounting data from NE's
-
- with efficient use of network, storage, and processing resources.
-
- This document specifies the architecture of the protocol and the message
-
- format, which MUST be supported by all CRANE protocol implementations.
-
- This memo provides information for the Internet community.
-
Page 30
- 3422 Okamoto Nov 2002 Forwarding Media Access
-
Control (MAC) Frames over
Multiple Access Protocol over
Synchronous Optical
Network/Synchronous Digital
Hierarchy (MAPOS)
- This memo describes a method for forwarding media access control (MAC)
-
- frames over Multiple Access Protocol over Synchronous Optical
-
- Network/Synchronous Digital Hierarchy (MAPOS), thus providing a way to
-
- unify MAPOS network environment and MAC-based Local Area Network (LAN)
-
- environment. This memo provides information for the Internet community.
-
- 3421 Zhao Nov 2002 Select and Sort Extensions for
-
the Service Location Protocol
(SLP)
- This document defines two extensions (Select and Sort) for the Service
-
- Location Protocol (SLP). These extensions allow a User Agent (UA) to
-
- request that the Uniform Resource Locator (URL) entries in a Service
-
- Reply (SrvRply) be limited to the specified number, or be sorted
-
- according to the specified sort key list. Using these two extensions
-
- together can facilitate discovering the best match, such as finding a
-
- service that has the maximum speed or the minimum load. This memo
-
- defines an Experimental Protocol for the Internet community.
-
- 3420 Sparks Nov 2002 Internet Media Type
-
message/sipfrag
- This document registers the message/sipfrag Multipurpose Internet Mail
-
- Extensions (MIME) media type. This type is similar to message/sip, but
-
- allows certain subsets of well formed Session Initiation Protocol (SIP)
-
- messages to be represented instead of requiring a complete SIP message.
-
- In addition to end-to-end security uses, message/sipfrag is used with
-
- the REFER method to convey information about the status of a referenced
-
- request. [STANDARDS TRACK]
-
Page 31
- 3419 Daniele Dec 2002 Textual Conventions for
-
Transport Addresses
- This document introduces a Management Information Base (MIB) module that
-
- defines textual conventions to represent commonly used transport-layer
-
- addressing information. The definitions are compatible with the concept
-
- of TAddress/TDomain pairs introduced by the Structure of Management
-
- Information version 2 (SMIv2) and support the Internet transport
-
- protocols over IPv4 and IPv6. [STANDARDS TRACK]
-
- 3418 Presuhn Dec 2002 Management Information Base
-
(MIB) for the Simple Network
Management Protocol (SNMP)
- This document defines managed objects which describe the behavior of a
-
- Simple Network Management Protocol (SNMP) entity. This document
-
- obsoletes RFC 1907, Management Information Base for Version 2 of the
-
- Simple Network Management Protocol (SNMPv2). [STANDARDS TRACK]
-
- 3417 Presuhn Dec 2002 Transport Mappings for
-
the Simple Network Management
Protocol (SNMP)
- This document defines the transport of Simple Network Management
-
- Protocol (SNMP) messages over various protocols. This document
-
- obsoletes RFC 1906. [STANDARDS TRACK]
-
- 3416 Presuhn Dec 2002 Version 2 of the Protocol
-
Operations for the Simple
Network Management Protocol
(SNMP)
- This document defines version 2 of the protocol operations for the
-
- Simple Network Management Protocol (SNMP). It defines the syntax and
-
- elements of procedure for sending, receiving, and processing SNMP PDUs.
-
- This document obsoletes RFC 1905. [STANDARDS TRACK]
-
Page 32
- 3415 Wijnen Dec 2002 View-based Access Control
-
Model (VACM) for the
Simple Network Management
Protocol (SNMP)
- This document describes the View-based Access Control Model (VACM) for
-
- use in the Simple Network Management Protocol (SNMP) architecture. It
-
- defines the Elements of Procedure for controlling access to management
-
- information. This document also includes a Management Information Base
-
(MIB) for remotely managing the configuration parameters for the View-
- based Access Control Model. This document obsoletes RFC 2575.
-
[STANDARDS TRACK]
- 3414 Blumenthal Dec 2002 User-based Security Model
-
(USM) for version 3 of the
Simple Network Management
Protocol (SNMPv3)
- This document describes the User-based Security Model (USM) for Simple
-
- Network Management Protocol (SNMP) version 3 for use in the SNMP
-
- architecture. It defines the Elements of Procedure for providing SNMP
-
- message level security. This document also includes a Management
-
- Information Base (MIB) for remotely monitoring/managing the
-
- configuration parameters for this Security Model. This document
-
- obsoletes RFC 2574. [STANDARDS TRACK]
-
- 3413 Levi Dec 2002 Simple Network Management
-
Protocol (SNMP) Applications
- This document describes five types of Simple Network Management Protocol
-
(SNMP) applications which make use of an SNMP engine as described in STD
- 62, RFC 3411. The types of application described are Command
-
- Generators, Command Responders, Notification Originators, Notification
-
- Receivers, and Proxy Forwarders.
-
- This document also defines Management Information Base (MIB) modules for
-
- specifying targets of management operations, for notification filtering,
-
- and for proxy forwarding. This document obsoletes RFC 2573. [STANDARDS
-
- TRACK]
-
Page 33
- 3412 Case Dec 2002 Message Processing and
-
Dispatching for the Simple
Network Management Protocol
(SNMP)
- This document describes the Message Processing and Dispatching for
-
- Simple Network Management Protocol (SNMP) messages within the SNMP
-
- architecture. It defines the procedures for dispatching potentially
-
- multiple versions of SNMP messages to the proper SNMP Message Processing
-
- Models, and for dispatching PDUs to SNMP applications. This document
-
- also describes one Message Processing Model - the SNMPv3 Message
-
- Processing Model. This document obsoletes RFC 2572. [STANDARDS TRACK]
-
- 3411 Harrington Dec 2002 An Architecture for Describing
-
Simple Network Management
Protocol (SNMP) Management
Frameworks
- This document describes an architecture for describing Simple Network
-
- Management Protocol (SNMP) Management Frameworks. The architecture is
-
- designed to be modular to allow the evolution of the SNMP protocol
-
- standards over time. The major portions of the architecture are an SNMP
-
- engine containing a Message Processing Subsystem, a Security Subsystem
-
- and an Access Control Subsystem, and possibly multiple SNMP applications
-
- which provide specific functional processing of management data. This
-
- document obsoletes RFC 2571. [STANDARDS TRACK]
-
- 3410 Case Dec 2002 Introduction and Applicability
-
Statements for Internet
Standard Management Framework
- The purpose of this document is to provide an overview of the third
-
- version of the Internet-Standard Management Framework, termed the SNMP
-
- version 3 Framework (SNMPv3). This Framework is derived from and builds
-
- upon both the original Internet-Standard Management Framework (SNMPv1)
-
- and the second Internet-Standard Management Framework (SNMPv2).
-
- The architecture is designed to be modular to allow the evolution of the
-
- Framework over time.
-
- The document explains why using SNMPv3 instead of SNMPv1 or SNMPv2 is
-
- strongly recommended. The document also recommends that RFCs 1157,
-
- 1441, 1901, 1909 and 1910 be retired by moving them to Historic status.
-
- This document obsoletes RFC 2570. This memo provides information for
-
- the Internet community.
-
Page 34
- 3409 Svanbro Dec 2002 Lower Layer Guidelines for
-
Robust RTP/UDP/IP Header
Compression
- This document describes lower layer guidelines for robust header
-
- compression (ROHC) and the requirements ROHC puts on lower layers. The
-
- purpose of this document is to support the incorporation of robust
-
- header compression algorithms, as specified in the ROHC working group,
-
- into different systems such as those specified by Third Generation
-
- Partnership Project (3GPP), 3GPP Project 2 (3GPP2), European Technical
-
- Standards Institute (ETSI), etc. This document covers only lower layer
-
- guidelines for compression of RTP/UDP/IP and UDP/IP headers as specified
-
- in [RFC3095]. Both general guidelines and guidelines specific for
-
- cellular systems are discussed in this document. This memo provides
-
- information for the Internet community.
-
- 3408 Liu Dec 2002 Zero-byte Support for
-
Bidirectional Reliable Mode
(R-mode) in Extended
Link-Layer Assisted RObust
Header Compression (ROHC)
Profile
- This document defines an additional mode of the link-layer assisted
-
- RObust Header Compression (ROHC) profile, also known as the zero-byte
-
- profile, beyond the two defined in RFC 3242. Zero-byte header
-
- compression exists in order to prevent the single-octet ROHC header from
-
- pushing a packet voice stream into the next higher fixed packet size for
-
- the radio. It is usable in certain widely deployed older air
-
- interfaces. This document adds the zero-byte operation for ROHC
-
- Bidirectional Reliable mode (R-mode) to the ones specified for
-
- Unidirectional (U-mode) and Bidirectional Optimistic (O-mode) modes of
-
- header compression in RFC 3242. [STANDARDS TRACK]
-
- 3407 Andreasen Oct 2002 Session Description Protocol
-
(SDP) Simple Capability
Declaration
- This document defines a set of Session Description Protocol (SDP)
-
- attributes that enables SDP to provide a minimal and backwards
-
- compatible capability declaration mechanism. Such capability
-
- declarations can be used as input to a subsequent session negotiation,
-
- which is done by means outside the scope of this document. This
-
- provides a simple and limited solution to the general capability
-
- negotiation problem being addressed by the next generation of SDP, also
-
- known as SDPng. [STANDARDS TRACK]
-
Page 35
- 3406 Daigle Oct 2002 Uniform Resource Names (URN)
-
Namespace Definition
Mechanisms
- This document lays out general definitions of and mechanisms for
-
- establishing Uniform Resource Names (URN) "namespaces". The URN WG has
-
- defined a syntax for URNs in RFC 2141, as well as some proposed
-
- mechanisms for their resolution and use in Internet applications in RFC
-
- 3401 and RFC 3405. The whole rests on the concept of individual
-
"namespaces" within the URN structure. Apart from proof-of-concept
- namespaces, the use of existing identifiers in URNs has been discussed
-
- in RFC 2288. This document specifies an Internet Best Current Practices
-
- for the Internet Community, and requests discussion and suggestions for
-
- improvements.
-
- 3405 Mealling Oct 2002 Dynamic Delegation Discovery
-
System (DDDS) Part Five:
URI.ARPA Assignment Procedures
- This document is fifth in a series that is completely specified in
-
"Dynamic Delegation Discovery System (DDDS) Part One: The Comprehensive
- DDDS" (RFC 3401). It is very important to note that it is impossible to
-
- read and understand any document in this series without reading the
-
- others. This document specifies an Internet Best Current Practices for
-
- the Internet Community, and requests discussion and suggestions for
-
- improvements.
-
- 3404 Mealling Oct 2002 Dynamic Delegation Discovery
-
System (DDDS) Part Four: The
Uniform Resource Identifiers
(URI) Resolution Application
- This document describes a specification for taking Uniform Resource
-
- Identifiers (URI) and locating an authoritative server for information
-
- about that URI. The method used to locate that authoritative server is
-
- the Dynamic Delegation Discovery System.
-
- This document is part of a series that is specified in "Dynamic
-
- Delegation Discovery System (DDDS) Part One: The Comprehensive DDDS"
-
(RFC 3401). It is very important to note that it is impossible to read
- and understand any document in this series without reading the others.
-
[STANDARDS TRACK]
Page 36
- 3403 Mealling Oct 2002 Dynamic Delegation Discovery
-
System (DDDS) Part Three: The
Domain Name System (DNS)
Database
- This document describes a Dynamic Delegation Discovery System (DDDS)
-
- Database using the Domain Name System (DNS) as a distributed database of
-
- Rules. The Keys are domain-names and the Rules are encoded using the
-
- Naming Authority Pointer (NAPTR) Resource Record (RR).
-
- Since this document obsoletes RFC 2915, it is the official specification
-
- for the NAPTR DNS Resource Record. It is also part of a series that is
-
- completely specified in "Dynamic Delegation Discovery System (DDDS) Part
-
- One: The Comprehensive DDDS" (RFC 3401). It is very important to note
-
- that it is impossible to read and understand any document in this series
-
- without reading the others. [STANDARDS TRACK]
-
- 3402 Mealling Oct 2002 Dynamic Delegation Discovery
-
System (DDDS) Part Two: The
Algorithm
- This document describes the Dynamic Delegation Discovery System (DDDS)
-
- algorithm for applying dynamically retrieved string transformation rules
-
- to an application-unique string. Well-formed transformation rules will
-
- reflect the delegation of management of information associated with the
-
- string. This document is also part of a series that is completely
-
- specified in "Dynamic Delegation Discovery System (DDDS) Part One: The
-
- Comprehensive DDDS" (RFC 3401). It is very important to note that it is
-
- impossible to read and understand any document in this series without
-
- reading the others. [STANDARDS TRACK]
-
- 3401 Mealling Oct 2002 Dynamic Delegation Discovery
-
System (DDDS) Part One: The
Comprehensive DDDS
- This document specifies the exact documents that make up the complete
-
- Dynamic Delegation Discovery System (DDDS). DDDS is an abstract
-
- algorithm for applying dynamically retrieved string transformation rules
-
- to an application-unique string. This document along with RFC 3402, RFC
-
- 3403 and RFC 3404 obsolete RFC 2168 and RFC 2915, as well as updates RFC
-
- 2276 This memo provides information for the Internet community.
-
Page 37
- 3400 Never Issued
-
RFC 3400 was never issued.
- Security Considerations
-
Security issues are not discussed in this memo.
- Author's Address
-
Sandy Ginoza
University of Southern California
Information Sciences Institute
4676 Admiralty Way
Marina del Rey, CA 90292
Phone: (310) 822-1511
EMail: ginoza@isi.edu
Page 38
- Full Copyright Statement
-
Copyright © The Internet Society (2003). All Rights Reserved.
This document and translations of it may be copied and furnished to
others, and derivative works that comment on or otherwise explain it
or assist in its implementation may be prepared, copied, published
and distributed, in whole or in part, without restriction of any
kind, provided that the above copyright notice and this paragraph are
included on all such copies and derivative works. However, this
document itself may not be modified in any way, such as by removing
the copyright notice or references to the Internet Society or other
Internet organizations, except as needed for the purpose of
developing Internet standards in which case the procedures for
copyrights defined in the Internet Standards process must be
followed, or as required to translate it into languages other than
English.
The limited permissions granted above are perpetual and will not be
revoked by the Internet Society or its successors or assigns.
This document and the information contained herein is provided on an
"AS IS" basis and THE INTERNET SOCIETY AND THE INTERNET ENGINEERING
TASK FORCE DISCLAIMS ALL WARRANTIES, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING
BUT NOT LIMITED TO ANY WARRANTY THAT THE USE OF THE INFORMATION
HEREIN WILL NOT INFRINGE ANY RIGHTS OR ANY IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF
MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.
- Acknowledgement
-
Funding for the RFC Editor function is currently provided by the
Internet Society.
-